THE Holyrood inquiry into the Alex Salmond affair has written to Nicola Sturgeon's husband seeking "further clarification" on evidence he provided.
Peter Murrell, the chief executive of the SNP, appeared before the committee earlier this month, where he denied being part of a plot to bring down the former first minister.
However apparent inconsistencies in his evidence were later seized on by critics.
Now SNP MSP Linda Fabiani, convener of the Holyrood committee, has written to Mr Murrell requesting more information.
Her letter covers four areas.
The first is Mr Murrell's awareness of a meeting between Mr Salmond and Ms Sturgeon in the First Minister's home on April 2, 2018.
Mr Murrell gave conflicting evidence about when he was aware Mr Salmond was coming to the house.
He also said he was not present, but later added that he arrived home “not long before the meeting ended” but did not join it.
Elsewhere, Ms Fabiani said the committee wanted further clarification around Mr Murrell's understanding of the nature of the meeting.
He previously told MSPs that he had asked Ms Sturgeon afterwards whether it related to a Sky News query in 2017 about alleged inappropriate behaviour by Mr Salmond at Edinburgh Airport.
Ms Fabiani wrote: "Given the time that had elapsed between the Sky News enquiry and the meeting in April, and that you had not been in contact with Mr Salmond in that time, the committee seeks insight as to why you considered it possible that the meeting related to the Sky News story.
"The committee also seeks insight as to why the Sky News story would be the basis for a meeting that you may have considered most likely to be a Government matter.
"To inform the session with the First Minister, it would be useful to establish whether you assumed the meeting was a Government matter before it happened and whether you continued to assume so after the meeting took place."
Ms Fabiani also asked Mr Murrell to confirm whether he has used WhatsApp or other messaging services in the past to discuss any concerns relating to Mr Salmond.
Mr Murrell previously told the committee he did not use WhatsApp.
It later emerged he had the app on his phone. but he said he still did not use it.
Finally, Mr Murrell has been asked for clarification on when he became aware of allegations about Mr Salmond's behaviour in London.
Mr Murrell has been asked to respond to the committee by January 13.
The cross-party inquiry is examining how the Scottish Government botched a probe into sexual misconduct claims made against Mr Salmond in 2018.
Mr Salmond had the exercise set aside in a judicial review after the Government conceded it was "tainted by apparent bias", a flaw that left taxpayers with a £512,000 bill for his costs.
Shortly after his civil case victory, the former first minister was charged with sexual assault in January 2019, leading to a criminal trial and acquittal on all counts in March this year.
Giving evidence earlier this month, Mr Murrell said it wasn't true that text messages he sent apparently urging police and prosecution action against Mr Salmond were evidence of a conspiracy.
The messages are seen by Mr Salmond's supporters as evidence of a high-level plot to stop him making a comeback and rivalling his successor.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel